Mathew Carr

The suppression of almost-free energy is the biggest crime of all (and a sophisticated coverup is ongoing) (6)

–Canada MP breaks cover; long-dated crude oil should be falling; NYT’s podcaster looks into it; CarrZee’s take …also on the questionable Bonn intersessional climate talks

By Mathew Carr

June 19-22, 2023 — Given the dire state of the climate, the suppression of technology that masters gravity and would solve the energy and climate crisis within two decades is a deeply sinister crime.

That’s what seems to have happened.

While the uncovering of the world’s biggest cover up is a bit of a slow burner, a growing number of people are keen to hold culprits to account unless they come clean in the next six months.

This is according to Steven Greer, a former trauma doctor who is bringing together military and contractor whistleblowers and has founded the Disclosure Project to show how the US government, military officers and weapons makers have covered up the existence of alien technology, and much more, since the second world war.

If you have not watched this June 12 press conference below, please do so. I also watched Greer’s new film, The Lost Century and How to Reclaim It (Amazon Prime), which I also recommend because it calls into question the existing political and economic foundations of the world. I’m not exaggerating.

If true (and it seems to be credible to me), the revelations mean humankind has had the ability to tap energy from water, or soil, easily and cheaply for the past eight decades, or so. This would mean the “conspiracy theories” are true.

See this explainer from Encyclopedia Britannica on how the zero-point energy mentioned by Greer might work (the Encyclopedia is not citing Greer, but explaining the terms used by Greer and his many compelling contacts and historical scientists):

zero-point energy, vibrational energy that molecules retain even at the absolute zero of temperature. Temperature in physics has been found to be a measure of the intensity of random molecular motion, and it might be expected that, as temperature is reduced to absolute zero, all motion ceases and molecules come to rest. In fact, however, the motion corresponding to zero-point energy never vanishes.

Zero-point energy results from principles of quantum mechanics, the physics of subatomic phenomena. Should the molecules ever come completely to rest, their component atoms would be precisely located and would simultaneously have precisely specified velocities, namely, of value zero. But it is an axiom of quantum mechanics that no object can ever have precise values of position and velocity simultaneously (see uncertainty principle); thus molecules can never come completely to rest.

I asked Google’s Bard AI to put it in layman’s terms, which I repeat here:

Zero-point energy is the lowest possible energy that a quantum mechanical system may have. This means that even at absolute zero, where all thermal motion has ceased, there is still some residual energy present.

The reason for this is that quantum mechanics tells us that particles cannot have a precise position and momentum at the same time. This is known as the Heisenberg uncertainty principle. As a result, even when a particle is in its lowest energy state, it is still fluctuating in position and momentum. This fluctuation gives rise to a small amount of energy, known as zero-point energy.

Zero-point energy is a very real phenomenon, and it has been experimentally verified. However, it is very difficult to harness because it is spread out over a very large volume. In order to extract any significant amount of zero-point energy, we would need to create a very small vacuum chamber and then cool it to absolute zero. This is a very challenging task, and it is not yet clear whether it is even possible.

If it is possible, houses could be built anywhere on earth, no matter how bad climate change gets because energy and water would be free or close to free. A home’s power source could be small box sitting in the corner on the living room, like this (according to two snips from Greer’s film):

From big power stations to tiny ones

Now, Greer reckons some people who have covered up the technology should be considered for immunity against prosecution, if they come clean within about 6 months. A few hours after I first wrote this:

Greer’s point is you don’t want to escalate what’s already a very dangerous situation for the planet by starting aggressive new police actions / litigation, until we know what’s to know.

And perhaps China and the US scaling back their aggression this week is a good first sign.

Yet, this coverup story is really about a global establishment class that is refusing to be held to account. The mainstream media, some of the biggest beneficiaries from greenwash, are declining to cover the story properly.

That is starting to change. See this:

US Retrieved Intact Craft of Non-Human Origin: the Debrief + Video + IFOs(1)

And this:

CarrZee’s take on the UFO technology story:

The reason why I’m so curious about reverse-engineered alien technology is I’ve dedicated the past 20 years of my career to reporting about the climate crisis and solutions.

I began writing about the EU carbon market in about 2003 as a financial reporter for Bloomberg News, the New York-based global news service that’s perhaps the world’s most influential provider across markets, servicing giant banks and global corporations and hundreds of thousands of others.

The carbon market is Europe’s cornerstone climate policy, placing a price on greenhouse gas emissions and helping the region cut them down. They’ve fallen by about one third since peaking around 1980 — as global emissions continue to reach records.

See this chart:

Instead of listening to rational calls for aggressive action the past 20 years, certain countries have been feasting on ill-gotten energy money while others suffer terribly.

If it’s true that we had cheap and abundant clean technology all along, and it was just being suppressed, then I’ve arguably wasted a serious amount of my life. And the world has been placed in the most serious jeopardy for no good reason.

I was fired by Bloomberg in May 2020 after years of blowing the whistle about the firm’s bad climate news.

I argued the media company was underplaying the global heating crisis and it was dismissive of the reporting that I wanted to do to show how humankind could prevent disaster by installing EU-like policies across the world.

My bosses in the newsroom got weirder and weirder in the 10 years leading up to my dismissal.

Hitting Allies: My 2019 Nord Stream Story for Bloomberg That Was Never Published Was a Peek Into Now  (6)

Bloomberg LP eventually made up false allegations that I was incapable of doing my job. I’ve been in a bitter litigation ever since they fired me and the firm, one of the most profitable on earth, now wants me to pay some of their legal costs. They said I should pay £40,000 (of probably millions) and the court has ordered I pay £10,000. I’m still resisting.

I argue the firm mislead the UK judicial system the past three years and/or the judiciary simply didn’t want to properly deal with my case. The UK is a close ally of the U.S.

The sophisticated coverup of UFO-linked clean technology by the US military industrial complex makes the behaviour of Bloomberg LP more understandable, from my point of view, at least.

It seems that media barrons around the world are complicit in demonising people who wanted climate action and wanted to disclose the existence of clean-alien technology, while companies made trillions of dollars out of polluting fossil fuels. Remember the US is the world’s biggest petro state, by far, yet has only 4% of the world’s people.

Timeline

June 2023

I contend a sophisticated coverup operation is ongoing.

The past couple of weeks I’ve been trying to get senior officials within the United Nations, environmentalist Greta Thunberg, leading envoys overseeing climate talks and the US Department of Defense to comment.

On June 13 of this month, I attended this event held by

Anne-Sophie Cerisola

Director, Climate Action Team, Executive Office of the UN Secretary-General (Antonio Guterres)

Guterres seems to think another talking shop will help save the climate, specifically one planned for September of this year.

I asked Cerisola at the event whether she or the wider UN was going to find out over the next few months who has been suppressing information on available non-fossil-fuel technology. (Not just the US but all nations, including space travellers China and Russia.)

She didn’t know about that, she said.

Here is the webcast.

According to Cerisola, the UN is now keen to “accelerate” climate action. “We are really far from where we need to be,” she said.

What is interesting about the webcast delivered onto the website is that the UNFCCC secretariat seem to have messed it up. (Remember Mike Bloomberg is a UN appointed climate envoy ….just saying…not saying he’s involved in any coverups. He’s too philanthropic for that.)

The event was about two hours, yet only about one quarter of it is actually available for you to watch. Much of it has been suppressed, including my question, near the end.

It’s probably just another mistake.

Another interesting thing to note is the slide above, which again seems to be a UN attempt to demonize carbon trading, or offsetting, or compensating for climate damage, a scientifically valid strategy which companies and emerging nations want to undertake because it gives them a way to manage risk / win climate finance during one of humankind’s most frightening global transitions ever — away from unabated fossil fuels.

Note in the slide it says “no use of offsets.” It’s not hard and fast, Cerisola said.

You could not make this stuff up.

I’m not saying the UNFCCC deliberately is suppressing the whole event or demonizing legitimate climate action. I don’t want to be threatened again with a defamation lawsuit.

Yet, it’s a weird mistake. (Remember also that Mike Bloomberg is also pushing a global transparency initiative to make all companies disclose more information on their emissions and climate-action efforts.)

I reckon real transparency would require all agreements between all countries and fossil-fuel companies to be made public and those who made them should be held to account for each and every clause in them. The secrecy and coverups need to stop.

Note also the weirdness in the slide above over the phrase “economy wide” in the first column. This is crucial as it indicates carbon pricing or climate policy should be economy wide in the nationally determined contributions (NDCs) made by 2025 (many OECD and big nations are late with their climate plans, known as NDCs in UNFCCC jargon. Oh …And “absolute” emission cuts will be needed — again …you can’t completely offset your way out of trouble, folks.

Don’t forget that. That’s the most important thing, you see!

Here’s a picture I took at the event itself.

Why has the gobbledegook been placed over the “economy wide” phrasing? Please let me and my readers know at mathew@carrzee.net, UNFCCC secretariat.

Later on the same day, there was a press conference held by Greta Thunberg and others about scaling back fossil fuels.

The webcast of that event has failed to turn up on the website, though it must have been filmed because there was an “overflow” room, apparently. The other press conferences seem to be there.

I’m probably just missing it.

Perhaps the video will show up. See also how it is also listed at the wrong time (I think)?

Indeed, there are 544 events at the intersessional climate talks held in Bonn June 5-15, yet the most interesting events are not recorded and nor are they available for webcast viewing pleasure.

Envoys are not being held to account for what they say, whether they push for more ambitious action, or argue for delay. (eg the loss and damage event listed below for the last day.)

There is quite a lot of interesting stuff there, still …yet little accountability for the millions of euros spent of taxpayer’s money on the really important stuff (and it’s almost as if CarrZee was never there).

Also, the global mainstream media are not nuanced enough to handle real transparency, anyway — I have real empathy with this argument, having been a 25+ year insider.

Near the end of my visit to the negotiations on the second-last day, I asked an envoy standing in the over-air-conditioned space under the glass roof of the World Congress Centre Bonn whether the climate talks were deliberately being made much more complicated than they really need to be — to water down accountability for the damage being caused.

Yeah, it does seem like that, he said….having spent a frustrating volume of hours of his life in meetings designed largely to stroke the egos of the greedy and reckless.

The negotiations are really about two things:

— keeping heat-trapping gas from getting to the atmosphere to warm the planet and damage the oceans (and keeping that from happening in a just way); [and if it takes alien tech to make that happen, then so be it]

— providing for adaptation, loss and damage in a just way

Inclusion and accountability are important. Negotiations between 190 or so countries are never going to be a breeze.

But 544 siloed events for a halfway-through-2023-UN meeting when everyone pretty much knows by now what needs to be done (despite the misleading and greedy behavior by rich countries over the past 80 years)? Really?

One thing is for sure. Coverups should be avoided….especially of clean tech, no matter where it is from.

Another envoy shivered in her slip dress, despite the warming outside temperatures.

(Smoothed some language, Feb. 2024)

Light orb over Washington DC: source is person who regularly sees this phenomenon — exclusive to CarrZee

CarrZee: I’m surprised long-dated crude oil futures are not falling even further on these UFO disclosures:

Brent futures

NOTES

Greer, below, introduces Garcia, below that, who is among about 90 lawyers looking to hold people to account

Brent Crude Closed at Lowest Since January 2022 After Military Whistleblowers Spoke About Alien Tech Coverup (2)

11 comments

Leave a Reply