Mathew Carr

Brazil’s Teenage girls v the Zionist-Epstein-media complex + corrupt Meta

Guardian

https://www.theguardian.com/music/2026/oct/20/taylor-swift-tells-us-to-take-the-lead-could-highly-organised-pop-fans-clinch-victory-for-brazils-lula?CMP=Share_iOSApp_Other

However…Bolsonaro is part of the Zionist-Epstein-media complex…sigh….so is cheating Meta.

How this UK by-election predicts Trump has a better-than-expected chance at the midterms: he’s part of the Zionist-Epstein-media complex (3)

Gemini:

Brazil’s Superior Electoral Court (TSE) has already levied escalating daily fines against Meta.

Regulatory Actions & Fines Imposed

  • Initial Penalty (October 15, 2026): Justice Marco Aurélio Bellizze issued an injunction ordering Meta to ensure strict algorithmic neutrality between presidential candidates Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva and Flávio Bolsonaro across Facebook, Instagram, and WhatsApp. Non-compliance carried an initial fine of 500,000 Brazilian reals per day (~$100,000 USD).
  • Unanimous Confirmation (October 16, 2026): The full bench of the Superior Electoral Court voted unanimously to uphold the order.
  • Increased Fine (October 19, 2026): After Meta failed to adequately demonstrate full compliance within the required timeframe, the court doubled the fine to 1 million reals per day (~$200,000 USD).

Allegations & Background

The legal measures stem from formal complaints filed by Lula’s campaign, which highlighted several specific technical and algorithmic issues: Platform / MechanismDisruption / Violation Ad ManagementLula’s ad campaign account was temporarily suspended on September 23 due to anti-fraud flags, and an Instagram system glitch blocked paid ad boosting for nearly 24 hours in early October. Organic Reach & Recommendations

Lula’s campaign alleged “unjustified reductions in reach,” while candidate profile recommendations—which are explicitly restricted under Brazilian electoral law—were observed favoring opposing content. AI Content ToolsMeta’s AI image generator rejected prompts for Lula’s campaign materials while permitting similar prompts for his rival due to name-recognition parsing errors.

Meta’s Response

Meta denied any intentional political bias or regulatory defiance. The company maintained that the issues stemmed from routine, temporary technical glitches that affected advertisers globally, rather than targeted actions within Brazil. Meta stated that all technical issues identified by the court were resolved or rolled back promptly.

Leave a Reply