Dec futures price on Ice rose to 80.44 euros today before falling slightly by noon London time Tuesday. Increased ~4% Monday.

Gemini

European carbon allowances (EUAs) surged early this week, carrying strong upward momentum into today. The rally is being driven by a dense mix of immediate geopolitical shifts, intense speculation around upcoming regulatory votes, and structural policy changes in Brussels.
Four key factors are driving the sudden move:

1. Geopolitical Spillovers (The US-Iran News)

The macro-energy complex received a massive shock following announcements that a formal peace memorandum between Iran and the United States is expected to be signed. While lower geopolitical risk typically cools down natural gas and energy markets (which can pull carbon down), the sudden shift caused a wave of volatile re-positioning across European energy and compliance desks, sparking a sharp short-covering rally in morning trade.

2. Speculation Over Free Allocation Benchmarks

Traders are aggressively pricing in risk ahead of a critical EU vote regarding proposed benchmark adjustments for free allocations (the carbon quotas given to heavy industry for free to prevent them from leaving Europe).

• The Leak: A leaked European Commission internal paper revealed plans to recalibrate rules to maintain a strict “effective carbon price.”
• The Backlash: Member states are heavily divided. Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni publicly launched a sharp attack on the draft EU ETS review, accusing Brussels of using technical loopholes to override previous political compromises. This political friction signals to the market that the future supply of free permits might tighten faster than expected.

3. The New ETS2 “Safeguard” Agreement

Late last week, the European Commission, Parliament, and Member States finalized an agreement tightening the Market Stability Reserve (MSR) for the upcoming ETS2 system (the separate carbon market for buildings and transport launching in 2028).

• The agreement doubled the number of emergency allowances the EU can inject if prices spike too quickly, signaling strong institutional commitment to making the carbon architecture permanent.
• The December 2028 futures contract (EUA2) immediately skyrocketed 4.4% (gaining €3 to break back over the €70/t mark), dragging the rest of the legacy EUA market up in sympathy.

4. Expansion of the Carbon Border Tax (CBAM)

In tandem with the ETS2 news, EU economic and finance ministers reached a consensus to expand the Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM).
Initially, CBAM only covered raw materials like raw aluminum, steel, and cement. The new position extends this carbon tariff to downstream machinery primarily made of steel or aluminum. By drawing a much wider ring around industrial imports, the EU has fundamentally reinforced the long-term, structural demand for carbon allowances within the Eurozone.

——-

Both the IMF and the US have made significant moves regarding carbon pricing over the last few weeks, though they are pulling in completely opposite directions.

1. The IMF: Defending Carbon Pricing (Despite Backlash)

On June 11, 2026, IMF Managing Director Kristalina Georgieva explicitly championed carbon pricing during a high-profile speech titled “Toward a European Energy Union.”

• The IMF’s Stance: Georgieva highlighted upcoming IMF research showing that a blend of carbon pricing—specifically cap-and-trade systems like the EU’s Emissions Trading System (ETS)—and targeted subsidies allows countries to transition to green energy with minimal negative impact on inflation or growth.
• The Fiscal Benefit: She noted that government revenues from carbon pricing could eventually hit 1% of GDP, creating substantial net fiscal space for public investments.
• The Underlying Friction: This public defense comes at a tense time. Recent global finance summits have seen heavy behind-the-scenes pressure from the US Treasury (under Secretary Scott Bessent) urging the IMF and World Bank to strip climate finance and carbon-targeting mandates from their core agendas, leading to reported “self-censorship” among some senior IMF staff.

2. The US: Actively Blocking Carbon Pricing Abroad

The US executive branch has been aggressively moving to halt international carbon pricing frameworks over the last few weeks.

• The IMO Shipping Carbon Tax Kill: In late May and early June 2026, the US successfully led a heavy diplomatic campaign to block a landmark global carbon price on the maritime shipping industry at the International Maritime Organization (IMO).
• Pressure Tactics: Reports from the negotiations revealed that US officials, including Secretary of State Marco Rubio, launched an intense campaign targeting developing nations—threatening retaliatory tariffs and visa bans—which successfully forced the IMO to delay its historic carbon pricing vote by a full year.
• The Congressional “Plan B”: While the administration is actively stripping carbon management from federal executive priorities, US congressional discussions in mid-June show a different undercurrent. Lawmakers are quietly keeping bipartisan carbon-linked trade measures (like the Foreign Pollution Fee Act) on life support. Congress views these domestic carbon tariffs as a necessary “Plan B” to shield US exporters from Europe’s structural Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM).