Opinion by Mathew Carr

The fast-tracked National Security (State Threat) Bill could place reporters and media in an impossible situation, where publishing a story could mean a journalist faces 14 years jail.

The bill makes it unlawful to receive information from a body that has been designated a threat to the UK (among other things).

Let’s paint a scenario.

If I as a journalist knew a whistleblower inside the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (correct) who could tell me where explosive mines or bombs are laid and the IRGC is designated under this proposed law …then I would be faced with an impossible choice.

Do I speak to the whistleblower and publish a story warning Uk soldiers/sailors about the risk …and risk 14 years in jail for myself? Or do I not investigate because of the risks to myself, letting British soldiers/sailors get blown up?

What decision do I make? Can anyone answer?

Parliamentarians should not be rushing this questionable law through parliament by July 16. It’s unclear to me whether the amendments create enough safety for journalists against prosecution.

Labour UK: Slow down this bill until after the summer recess and do a proper job instead of a rush job. It’s unclear why this bill needs to be fast tracked.

See amendments in the July 1 version on this page:

https://bills.parliament.uk/bills/4140

My request to the NUJ (National Union of Journalists):

ends