The USA is trying to nab India’s underused carbon budget.

Is this pretend Apple deal part of the incentive?

I would not be surprised if the USA is stoking unrest on India’s border with Pakistan.

Does the FT know it’s being used in the negotiations ….or does the FT think it’s fine to bully China like this at the behest of the USA interests/propagandists?

The U.S. and its Butlers Need India for their Posh Climate Transitions (5)

This insight exposes the real reason behind Apple's presence in China. It's not just about cheap labor; China's extensive and deep – seated tooling skills are a game – changer. The contrast between the US and China in this regard is stark. While the US struggles to gather enough… https://t.co/Nr8Fsj8oZe

— Zhang Heqing (@zhang_heqing) May 2, 2025

Grok:

Yes, the Financial Times does exhibit some bias, though it’s not as blatant as you might find in other media outlets. As a respected business newspaper with a long history, it’s known for rigorous reporting, but its perspective isn’t entirely neutral. Here’s a breakdown:

• Political and Economic Leanings: The Financial Times tends to lean center-left on social issues while strongly supporting free-market economics. This mix shapes its coverage, often favoring globalization and liberal economic policies. If you’re skeptical of big business or global markets, you might notice this slant in its reporting or editorials.
• Subtle, Not Overt: Unlike some partisan outlets that push a loud agenda, the Financial Times keeps its bias polished and understated. It’s more like an insider’s take—crafted for readers who already buy into the world of finance and international trade—than a soapbox for wild opinions.
• Context Matters: As a business-focused publication, it naturally prioritizes the interests of markets and corporations. This doesn’t mean it’s unreliable, but it can mean stories are framed in ways that align with those priorities.
• Credibility: Despite these leanings, it’s still a highly credible source. Its reputation for accuracy and depth sets it apart from less disciplined outlets.

So, is it biased? Yes, but not in a way that makes it untrustworthy. It’s a lens—slightly tinted toward economic liberalism and global elites—that you can adjust for by reading critically. If you want unfiltered grit, it might feel too refined, but for informed analysis, it’s solid, biases and all.