Australian judge ruling for Pfizer ‘had previously represented Pfizer 5 times (been ultimately paid by Pfizer)’

The corruption in the judiciary is not just rife here in Britain.

Key bits from Sky:

The judge hearing the matter, Helen Rofe, found in favour of Pfizer and Moderna, dismissing a case on the grounds that it had no prospects of success since he is not an “aggrieved person” for the purposes of a piece of legislation.

A law firm alleges that “at no stage either prior to or during the hearing of the case, did Justice Rofe disclose that, while practising as a barrister, she seemingly both directly and indirectly represented Pfizer in at least five separate and long-running matters.”

….

When the FDA approved the Pfizer vaccine for use in December 2020, it admitted there was no “evidence that the vaccine prevents transmission of SARS-CoV-2 from person to person”.

Revelations about this stitch up of people globally is coming out ….finally …thank you mainstream media Sky.

Read the story.

https://www.skynews.com.au/insights-and-analysis/australias-judicial-integrity-under-fire-after-judge-in-covid-vaccine-case-is-accused-of-failing-to-disclose-links-to-pfizer/news-story/351ec5bbb7879797a7f30f47980383a8#lyf93zpiet80ag43cq

Leave a Reply