By Mathew Carr
Feb. 4, 2023 — I’m saying in the headline that emission reduction credits should be seen as more “important” than carbon dioxide removal (CDR) credits …and so they should probably be seen by markets as more “valuable”.
Peters did not quite say this, but I’m saying it is an implication of what he is saying. This is what he did say:
Must-read thread on Twitter
[…] Bloomberg Sets Out Two Stupidly Stark Carbon-Offset Scenarios: $1t vs $15b Per Year (2) Why Emission Reductions Should Be More Valuable Than Removals: Peters […]
[…] Why Emission Reductions Should Be More Valuable Than Removals: Peters […]