Yet another disappointing example of the USA pretending on free markets.
Kalshi wants to offer 24 hour trade on ag commodities….but caved in when ICE and CME pushed back.
WTF CFTC?
Why limit the competition?
Gormless Bloomberg publishes a whole story without saying why 24 hour trading / betting is bad:
I’m all for guardrails on reckless competition and bad capitalism when there is logic. But not when the the logic isn’t there.
Protecting ICE and CME from competition isn’t logical. It’s oligopolistic and bad for competitive tension.
That Bloomberg fails to say why is very telling.
If a corn farmer wants to hedge on Kalshi at 3am ….who is the CFTC to stop him or her?
What about the farmer’s freedom to choose?
The USA has become all about protecting rich corporations from competition….market manipulation….it’s sickening.
America has been corrupted by OPEC.
Here is one AI view on the missing “why” in the story:
ChatGPT unchecked:
Short answer: agricultural firms aren’t objecting to “24-hour trading” out of nostalgia—they’re worried it changes who the market is for and how prices are formed.
Here’s the logic in plain terms.
1) These markets are supposed to be hedging tools—not casinos
Traditional agricultural futures (corn, wheat, soy, etc.) exist so farmers, grain merchants, and food companies can hedge real price risk.
Platforms like Kalshi blur that line by letting people trade on event outcomes (weather, crop yields, etc.) in a format that looks closer to betting. Regulators and critics already argue these products resemble gambling rather than hedging.
Why ag firms care:
If 24-hour access brings in large numbers of retail/speculative traders, the market can drift away from real supply-demand fundamentals toward sentiment and momentum.
2) Thin overnight liquidity = easier price distortion
Agricultural firms tend to operate on physical schedules (planting, harvesting, USDA reports). Overnight:
- Fewer commercial hedgers are active
- Liquidity drops
- Prices can move sharply on small trades
In a 24-hour prediction-style market, that creates a risk that prices get “set” when the real industry isn’t participating.
Concern: You wake up and your hedge is marked against a price formed by thin, possibly noisy overnight trading.
3) Information asymmetry becomes more dangerous
Ag markets are highly sensitive to:
- Weather data
- Satellite imagery
- Government reports
In a continuous market, someone with faster or privileged data can trade instantly—at any hour.
Prediction markets have already raised insider trading concerns in other contexts.
Why this matters more in 24h trading:
There’s no “closing bell” pause to digest information collectively—advantages compound.
4) Volatility without corresponding physical activity
Crops don’t change minute-by-minute, but 24h trading invites:
- Constant repricing
- Reaction to noise (rumours, model updates, social media)
That can increase short-term volatility without new fundamentals, making hedging less reliable.
5) Basis risk and mismatch with traditional markets
Farmers hedge using established exchanges (like CME) that have:
- Defined trading hours (even if extended)
- Deep liquidity
- Strong linkage to physical delivery markets
If a 24h prediction-style market diverges from those benchmarks, you get basis risk—your hedge doesn’t track your real exposure.
6) Cultural and regulatory discomfort
There’s also a softer but real issue:
- Agricultural markets are historically tied to food security
- Turning crop outcomes into always-on tradable “bets” feels politically sensitive
Given the broader backlash against prediction markets as “gambling in disguise,” agricultural groups worry about reputational and regulatory spillover.
Bottom line
Agricultural companies aren’t ضد liquidity—they’re against who provides it and when.
They worry 24-hour trading on platforms like Kalshi would:
- Shift markets from hedging → speculation
- Allow prices to form in illiquid periods
- Increase volatility and information asymmetry
- Undermine the link between financial prices and physical agriculture
If you want, I can map this onto your earlier “regulatory shock” scenario—because combining 24h trading + new fines/taxes/tariffs on data could amplify exactly these concerns.
……
