Development Bank Collaboration May Hint at Less-Divisive World — It’s Still Vastly Inadequate

Opinion by Mathew Carr

April 22, 2024 — The collaboration announced last week between 10 development banks hints that the world is not as divided as some would make out.

Example:

In Türkiye, the Government, with support from EBRD and in collaboration with the WBG, launched the low-carbon pathways (LCPs) initiative in March 2024, focusing on decarbonization in the steel, cement, aluminum, and fertilizer sectors. The LCPs aim to stimulate investments in low-carbon manufacturing technologies, energy efficiency measures, and circular economy solutions. It also supports infrastructure development, providing guidance on issues such as logistics, grids, carbon storage, renewable energy, and green hydrogen. 
From the report, for download, below

But the money being generated by the cooperation is still vastly inadequate, and there is a risk countries will lose ability to choose the help they need in crisis …if they are being treated unfairly by someone in the “in group.”

Some countries may face a “take it or leave it” negotiation stance from the collaborating banks.

If the banks gang up on countries they don’t like, that’s not necessarily progress.

Balancing the opportunities with the risks though, such collaboration will probably boost the chance to prevent criminal country leaders from ripping off / exploiting the development system.

Transparency will be key.

Here are the 10:

 African Development Bank (AfDB); Asian Development Bank (ADB); Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank (AIIB); Council of Europe Development Bank (CEB); European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD); European Investment Bank (EIB); Inter-American Development Bank (IDB); Islamic Development Bank (IsDB); New Development Bank (NDB); World Bank Group (WBG) 

Among the deliverables is this: “Scaling up MDB financing capacity. MDBs expect to generate additional lending headroom in the order of $300-400 billion over the next decade, with the support of shareholders and partners.”

This is a lot of money, yet it (and more) needs to be provided yearly rather than over 10 years, given the urgency of the climate crisis and biodiversity loss, for instance. An additional $1-$2 trillion is needed, just for climate, scientists have estimated.

Further, the language is vague …and it hints at exactly the opposite of what it purports to be saying. The statement below says the deliverables are “concrete” yet the term “headroom” is super vague. The phrase “with the support of shareholders and partners” is also unclear. Is that money conditional on the support? Who are these mysterious partners?

Please email me at mathew@carrzee.net if you know, if the banks can comment further.

See, also, the PDF document below.

It seems positive that such a variety of banks agreed during multiple geopolitical crises — this is a good thing.

New Development Bank is operated by BRICS, for instance, a grouping that appears at times to be at loggerheads with the “western” G7 nations.

Multilateral Development Banks deepen collaboration to deliver as a system

By EBRD  Press Office
@ebrd

20 Apr 2024

©IADB

Joint statement by the leaders of 10 multilateral development banks

The leaders of 10 multilateral development banks (MDBs) today announced joint steps to work more effectively as a system and increase the impact and scale of their work to tackle urgent development challenges.

In a Viewpoint Note, the leaders outlined key deliverables for joint and coordinated action in 2024 and beyond building on the progress since their Marrakesh statement in 2023, as their institutions work to accelerate progress toward the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and to better support clients in addressing regional and global challenges.

Published at the conclusion of a retreat hosted by the Inter-American Development Bank (IDB), which holds the rotating chair of the MDB Heads Group, the actions represent the strengthened collaboration amongst MDBs. The Note will also serve as a valuable contribution for the forthcoming G20 Roadmap to evolve MDBs into a “better, bigger and more effective” system and in other fora.

The MDB Heads committed to concrete and actionable deliverables in five critical areas:  

  1. Scaling up MDB financing capacity. MDBs expect to generate additional lending headroom in the order of $300-400 billion over the next decade, with the support of shareholders and partners. Actions include: 
  • Offering a diverse set of innovative financial instruments to shareholders, development partners and capital markets, including hybrid-capital and risk-transfer instruments, and promoting the channeling of the IMF’s Special Drawing Rights (SDRs) through MDBs.  
  • Providing more clarity on callable capital which would help rating agencies better assess the value of callable capital.  
  • Continuing to implement and report on the G20 Capital Adequacy Framework (CAF) Review recommendations and related reforms.  
  1. Boosting joint action on climate change. MDBs are increasing their common engagement on climate. Actions include:  
  1. Strengthening country-level collaboration and co-financing. MDBs are engaged in discussions and supporting country-owned and country-led platforms to make it easier for countries to work with the banks. Actions include:   
  • Assessing proposals on country-led and country-owned platforms, towards a common understanding and next steps, including for some MDBs to implement platforms.
  • Continue harmonising procurement practices, including by relying on each other’s procurement policies to reduce transaction costs and increase efficiency and sustainability.   
  • Accelerating co-financing of public-sector projects through the newly launched Collaborative Co-Financing Portal
  1. Catalysing private-sector mobilisation. MDBs are committed to scaling up private-sector financing for development goals, including by pursuing innovative approaches and financial instruments. Actions include:  
  • Scaling up local-currency lending and foreign-exchange hedging solutions to boost private investment. MDBs are working to identify scalable approaches. 
  • Expanding the type and disaggregation of the statistics that MDBs and Development Finance Institutions (DFIs) release through the Global Emerging Markets Risk Database (GEMs) Consortium, supporting investors to better assess investment risks and opportunities. 
  1. Enhancing development effectiveness and impact. MDBs agreed to heighten the focus on the impact of their work. Actions include:  
  • Increasing collaboration on joint impact evaluations, including by sharing approaches to monitoring and assessing impact, and pursuing harmonisation initiatives where useful.  
  • Taking stock of the key performance indicators (KPIs) on nature and biodiversity that are currently in use and explore the feasibility of alignment of some indicators ahead of COP30 in 2025.  

For more details see the Viewpoint Note.  See below

One comment

Leave a Reply