Climate Warehouse Vision, 28-Page Report for Download: Chia

Unedited introduction
Context

The Paris Agreement introduced a bottom-up approach for addressing climate change by enabling countries to pledge individual commitments through nationally determined contributions (NDCs).

Furthermore, Article 6 of the Paris Agreement recognizes that Parties may engage in bilateral cooperative approaches, including through the use of internationally transferred mitigation outcomes (ITMOs), to achieve their NDCs.

Heterogeneous climate markets may have different governance systems and technological approaches.

Information about mitigation outcomes (MOs) or emission reductions is currently collected in a variety of repositories, including spreadsheets and registries, with different levels of information. The differences in these processes may constrain market integration and add to the complexity of tracking and recording transactions.


Against this backdrop, there is a need to create a new architecture to support transparency and enhance the tradability of climate assets across jurisdictions while ensuring the integrity of trades. The Kyoto Protocol utilized an International Transaction Log (ITL), operated by the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), to facilitate communication between registries and maintain a transaction log to ensure accurate accounting and verification of transactions proposed by connected registries.

However, under the Paris Agreement, which may rely on a decentralized approach to markets under Article 6.2, climate negotiators are still determining whether a centralized infrastructure should continue, the functions it could perform, and to which market mechanisms or transactions it would apply.

Consistent with the bottom-up ethos of the Paris Agreement, there is value in demonstrating an approach to link registry systems in a peer-to-peer arrangement.

Climate Warehouse Vision


The World Bank’s Carbon Markets and Innovation team (CMI) has a mandate to pilot options to contribute to the understanding of the opportunities of Article 6 and build client capacities to engage in the next generation of climate markets.

As part of this mandate, CMI is exploring a Climate Warehouse ecosystem to demonstrate a decentralized information technology approach to connect climate market systems.

In the Climate Warehouse ecosystem, a meta-registry system would connect to country, regional, and institutional databases and registries to surface publicly-available information on MOs and record status changes to provide information on how MOs are used.

The objective of this meta-registry would be to reduce double counting risks by enhancing transparency and trust among market participants and tracking MOs across jurisdictions.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s